Cataract
American, European or Indian lens: does vision differ after cataract surgery?
This article is based on 17 cited scientific sources, listed at the end. It is for health education and does not replace a medical examination.
In this article
- What do we mean by an "American" or an "Indian" lens?
- What did studies that compared lenses directly find?
- What actually changes the quality of vision inside the lens?
- The difference that shows after years: material and edge
- What affects your vision more than the lens's country?
- If you have a retinal disease or diabetes
- Is the price difference worth it?
- Questions patients often ask
- Summary
"I was told the American lens is clearer, and the Indian one is cheaper but lower in quality. Will I really see more clearly if I pay more?" This question comes up often before cataract surgery, and it is a fair one. The short answer from the studies: the clarity of your vision is not decided by the lens's country. It is decided by the type of lens, its material and its design, and then by the accuracy of the measurements before surgery and the condition of the eye itself.
What do we mean by an "American" or an "Indian" lens?
In cataract surgery we remove the cloudy natural lens and put an artificial lens in its place, inside the capsule that held the original lens, where it stays for life. When people say "an American lens", "a German lens" or "an Indian lens", they usually mean the company that owns the brand name, not where the lens is made. Some well-known companies make their lenses in more than one country.
More importantly, every country offers many kinds of lens: monofocal lenses, multifocal lenses, lenses that correct astigmatism, and different materials. So a comparison is only fair between two lenses of the same type. We explain these types in our article on choosing an intraocular lens.
What did studies that compared lenses directly find?
The clearest evidence available is a clinical trial that randomly assigned patients to three monofocal lenses of the same category: two lenses from an Indian group of companies (Eyecryl Plus and Optiflex Genesis) and a well-known American lens (TECNIS 1). After one year, the three lenses did not differ in distance vision with or without glasses, or in contrast sensitivity, the ability to make out faint detail. The difference in visual acuity was less than one and a half letters on the reading chart, and it was not statistically significant (Brar et al., 2023). But this study was done by a single surgeon, was partly supported by the Indian company, and followed patients for only one year.
For lenses that correct astigmatism (toric lenses), two studies compared the Eyecryl Toric lens with the TECNIS Toric lens: vision without glasses was similar, and so was how well the lens stayed in position (Brar et al., 2021; Thulasidas et al., 2022). In a large Indian hospital, 1.8 of every 100 Indian toric lenses needed surgical repositioning, compared with 1.5 of every 100 American toric lenses, a difference that was not significant (Haripriya et al., 2021).
As for comparing European and Indian lenses of the same category, we found no reliable direct studies. The absence of evidence here does not mean that either side is better.
What actually changes the quality of vision inside the lens?
First: the aspheric design. In most eyes the cornea causes a slight distortion of the image, which increases when the pupil widens in dim light. An aspheric lens is designed to offset part of this distortion. In an analysis of 43 clinical trials, the difference between it and a conventional lens on the letter chart was very small, about half a letter. But contrast sensitivity was clearly better with it, especially in poor light (Schuster et al., 2013). This feature is available today in American, European and Indian lenses alike.
Second: the enhanced monofocal lens. This is a monofocal lens designed to stretch vision a little toward intermediate distance, such as a computer screen. In an analysis of several studies, it added about one line at this distance, without reducing distance vision or contrast, and without more halos around lights (Wan et al., 2022).
Third: multifocal lenses. These reduce dependence on glasses, but they do not give clearer vision; they make halos around lights at night more than three times as likely compared with a monofocal lens (de Silva et al., 2016). If your priority is the clearest possible image, rather than being free of glasses, the monofocal lens is closer to your goal.
The difference that shows after years: material and edge
Most foldable lenses are made from one of two kinds of acrylic. The first is water-repellent (hydrophobic), and the second is water-loving (hydrophilic). The difference between them shows over the long term, not in the first days.
Months or years after surgery, clouding of the capsule behind the lens can develop, so blurring gradually returns; it is usually treated with a simple laser session. In an analysis of nine clinical trials, the chance of needing this laser within two years was about seven times higher with water-loving lenses (Li et al., 2013). A sharp back edge on the lens also clearly reduces this clouding over the long term (Maedel et al., 2021).
Some water-repellent lenses can show tiny shiny spots inside the material. They look worrying on examination, but studies have not found that they meaningfully reduce visual acuity, even 15 years after surgery (Stanojcic et al., 2019; Mönestam and Behndig, 2016).
So the most important question about a lens is not "where is it from?" but: what is it made of? Does it have a sharp back edge? Is it aspheric?
What affects your vision more than the lens's country?
- Accurate measurements and lens power calculation: in a European registry of more than 280 thousand operations, about 73 of every 100 eyes ended up within half a diopter of the target (Lundström et al., 2018). Any remaining error affects how clearly you see without glasses. We explain the measurements in our article on cataract surgery.
- Residual astigmatism: this is the strongest factor in how clearly you see without glasses after surgery (Hasegawa et al., 2022). When there is significant astigmatism, a toric lens consistently improves this vision in studies (Kessel et al., 2016).
- Clouding of the back capsule: it first increases glare and haze, long before it lowers the reading on the letter chart (Meacock et al., 2003). So a patient may complain of poor vision while their reading at the examination is normal.
- The condition of the retina and macula: no lens can make up for a weak macula.
If you have a retinal disease or diabetes
With diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, or a membrane on the macula, contrast sensitivity is already reduced. That is why many doctors take extra care before choosing multifocal lenses for these patients, although the evidence does not rule them out completely (Grzybowski et al., 2020). And if the eye may later need retinal surgery with gas or air injected into it, there are reports of water-loving lenses calcifying after these operations, which may require the lens to be exchanged (Darcy et al., 2019). See also cataract surgery in diabetes and cataract surgery after vitrectomy.
Is the price difference worth it?
There is no evidence that a more expensive lens gives clearer distance vision than another lens of the same category. But a price difference can make sense in specific cases: moving from a water-loving material to a water-repellent material with a sharp edge, to reduce clouding over the long term; choosing an enhanced lens for someone who needs intermediate distance; or a toric lens when there is significant astigmatism. We make sure each patient knows what they are actually paying for, and what the price will not change.
Questions patients often ask
Is an American lens clearer than an Indian one?
The available studies did not show a meaningful difference in clarity of vision between American and Indian lenses of the same category, material and design (Brar et al., 2023). But the evidence on Indian lenses is still smaller and shorter in duration.
Does a higher price mean better vision?
Not necessarily. The price depends on the company, manufacturing, import and distribution, while the quality of vision depends on the lens design, its material, the accuracy of the measurements and the condition of the eye.
What should I ask my doctor when choosing a lens?
Is the lens water-repellent or water-loving? Is it aspheric? Do I have astigmatism that needs a toric lens? Does the condition of my retina allow every type of lens?
Can a cheap lens cause problems years later?
That depends on its material and design more than on its price. Water-loving lenses are linked to a greater chance of capsule clouding and of needing laser treatment (Li et al., 2013).
Summary
The lens's country is not what decides how clearly you see after cataract surgery. What makes the difference is: the right type of lens for your goal, an aspheric design, a water-repellent material with a sharp edge over the long term, then accurate measurements, correction of astigmatism, and a healthy retina. We discuss these points with each patient before choosing the lens, so the decision is based on their own eye, not on the name of a country.
This information is for health education and does not replace a medical examination.
References
- Brar, S., Rathod, D.P., Nikhil, R.P. and Ganesh, S. (2021) 'Clinical outcomes, predictability and rotational stability following implantation of Eyecryl toric versus TECNIS toric intraocular lenses-A comparative study', Int Ophthalmol, 41(11), pp. 3769–3780. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01944-5. PubMed
- Brar, S., Vanga, H.R., Shah, M.L. and Ganesh, S. (2023) 'A prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study to compare the safety and efficacy of different hydrophobic aspheric monofocal intraocular lenses', Indian J Ophthalmol, 71(3), pp. 771–778. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1073_22. PubMed
- Darcy, K., Apel, A., Donaldson, M., McDonald, R., Males, J., Coote, M. et al. (2019) 'Calcification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses following secondary surgical procedures in the anterior and posterior segments', British Journal of Ophthalmology, 103(12), pp. 1700–1703. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313385. PubMed
- de Silva, S.R., Evans, J.R., Kirthi, V., Ziaei, M. and Leyland, M. (2016) 'Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction', Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(12), CD003169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub4. PubMed
- Grzybowski, A., Kanclerz, P. and Tuuminen, R. (2020) 'Multifocal intraocular lenses and retinal diseases', Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 258(4), pp. 805–813. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04603-0. PubMed
- Haripriya, A., Gk, S., Mani, I. and Chang, D.F. (2021) 'Comparison of surgical repositioning rates and outcomes for hydrophilic vs hydrophobic single-piece acrylic toric IOLs', Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 47(2), pp. 178–183. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000415. PubMed
- Hasegawa, Y., Honbo, M., Miyata, K. and Oshika, T. (2022) 'Type of residual astigmatism and uncorrected visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes', Sci Rep, 12(1), article 1225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05311-x. PubMed
- Kessel, L., Andresen, J., Tendal, B., Erngaard, D., Flesner, P. and Hjortdal, J. (2016) 'Toric Intraocular Lenses in the Correction of Astigmatism During Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis', Ophthalmology, 123(2), pp. 275–286. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.002. PubMed
- Li, Y., Wang, J., Chen, Z. and Tang, X. (2013) 'Effect of hydrophobic acrylic versus hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification: meta-analysis', PLoS ONE, 8(11), e77864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077864. PubMed
- Lundström, M., Dickman, M., Henry, Y., Manning, S., Rosen, P., Tassignon, M.J. et al. (2018) 'Risk factors for refractive error after cataract surgery: Analysis of 282 811 cataract extractions reported to the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for cataract and refractive surgery', Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 44(4), pp. 447–452. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.031. PubMed
- Maedel, S., Evans, J.R., Harrer-Seely, A. and Findl, O. (2021) 'Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery', Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021(8), CD012516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012516.pub2. PubMed
- Meacock, W.R., Spalton, D.J., Boyce, J. and Marshall, J. (2003) 'The effect of posterior capsule opacification on visual function', Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 44(11), pp. 4665–4669. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0634. PubMed
- Mönestam, E. and Behndig, A. (2016) 'Change in light scattering caused by glistenings in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses from 10 to 15 years after surgery', Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 42(6), pp. 864–869. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.02.047. PubMed
- Schuster, A.K., Tesarz, J. and Vossmerbaeumer, U. (2013) 'The impact on vision of aspheric to spherical monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis', Ophthalmology, 120(11), pp. 2166–2175. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.011. PubMed
- Stanojcic, N., O'Brart, D.P.S., Maycock, N. and Hull, C.C. (2019) 'Effects of intraocular lens glistenings on visual function: a prospective study and presentation of a new glistenings grading methodology', BMJ Open Ophthalmol, 4(1), e000266. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000266. PubMed
- Thulasidas, M., Sasidharan, A. and Pradeep, B. (2022) 'Comparison of the clinical outcomes of Eyecryl™ and Tecnis® toric intraocular lenses: A real-world study', Indian J Ophthalmol, 70(3), pp. 801–806. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1650_21. PubMed
- Wan, K.H., Au, A.C.K., Kua, W.N., Ng, A.L.K., Cheng, G.P.M., Lam, N.M. et al. (2022) 'Enhanced Monofocal Versus Conventional Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Cataract Surgery: A Meta-analysis', J Refract Surg, 38(8), pp. 538–546. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20220707-01. PubMed