Cataract
20/20 (6/6) after cataract surgery, so why don't I see comfortably? Visual acuity versus quality of vision
This article is based on 15 cited scientific sources, listed at the end. It is for health education and does not replace a medical examination.
In this article
"The doctor told me my vision is 20/20 (6/6) after the operation, and that makes me happy. But the image is not as 'clean' as I expected: lights at night have a halo, my eyes get tired, and I need glasses to read." Eye doctors hear this complaint often, and it is a real complaint, not imagination or exaggeration. The 20/20 number measures one aspect of vision; it does not measure everything a patient experiences. This article does not diagnose your condition, but it explains how good vision on the chart can go together with uncomfortable vision, and the common reasons for this.
What does the letter chart measure, and what does it not?
Visual acuity is the sharpness of vision at a distance of 6 meters, and 6/6 (20/20) means normal vision on this test (Tavassoli et al., 2024). But the test uses clear black letters on a white background in good light. Daily life is different: a face in dim light, a staircase all in one color, a road at night with car headlights.
This is where other aspects of quality of vision appear. One is contrast sensitivity, the ability to make out faint detail. Another is glare, light scattering inside the eye and veiling the image. In an older study of cataract patients before surgery, their complaints about everyday vision were only weakly linked to visual acuity, but clearly linked to contrast sensitivity (Elliott et al., 1990).
It is also important to know whether the 6/6 was measured with glasses or without. You may read the whole chart through trial lenses in the clinic, while your vision without glasses remains below that.
Common causes of uncomfortable vision despite good acuity
This is not a complete list, and more than one cause can be present in the same patient. The examination is what identifies the cause.
Dryness of the eye surface. This is common after surgery. In an analysis of several studies, dry eye appeared in about 37.4% of patients who did not have it before surgery. It was most severe on the first day, lasted in the studies between 1 and 12 months at least, and affects the quality of vision (Miura et al., 2022). In a study from Upper Egypt of 100 patients, dryness appeared in 22% in the first week, and the tests then returned to normal within 12 weeks (Hamed et al., 2022). Dryness can make vision fluctuate during the day, and is sometimes accompanied by a burning or sandy feeling in the eye.
Residual focusing error or astigmatism. In a study of 17,152 eyes, residual astigmatism between 0.75 and 1.00 diopter was linked to roughly double the odds of being dissatisfied with vision with monofocal lenses (Schallhorn et al., 2021). Residual astigmatism is the strongest factor in how clearly you see without glasses after surgery (Hasegawa et al., 2022).
Near vision. A monofocal lens set for distance needs glasses for reading. In the Swedish national cataract register, the main explanation for patients' dissatisfaction despite a good clinical result was difficulty with near vision after surgery (Mollazadegan and Lundström, 2015). We explain choosing the focusing distance in our article on choosing an intraocular lens.
Light phenomena around lights. Halos are clearly more common with multifocal lenses than with monofocal lenses (de Silva et al., 2016). Some patients see a dark crescent-shaped shadow at the edge of their field of vision after surgery, called negative dysphotopsia. In a study of 250 operations, 15.2% of patients noticed it on the first day; it remained in 3.2% after one year, and in 2.4% after 2 and 3 years (Osher, 2008). The lens edge can also cause light reflections in some patients (Masket and Fram, 2021).
Capsule clouding behind the lens. It increases glare early, long before it lowers the reading on the letter chart (Meacock et al., 2003). This is why a patient may complain of blurring and glare while their reading at the examination is normal. We explain the difference between this and changes in the lens itself in our article on whether an implanted lens can become cloudy.
The macula. Swelling of the center of the retina can occur after surgery. In a study of 81,984 eyes, it occurred in 1.17% of eyes that had no complications or risk factors. The chance was clearly higher with diabetes, a membrane on the macula, or a retinal vein occlusion (Chu et al., 2016). It is detected with an OCT scan of the retina. See also our article on diabetic macular edema.
Lens design. An aspheric lens, for example, improves contrast in dim light with no meaningful difference in reading the chart (Schuster et al., 2013), as explained in spherical and aspheric lenses.
What might the examination include?
The doctor usually starts by measuring vision with and without glasses and measuring any residual astigmatism. Then they examine the eye surface and tears, the capsule and lens with the slit lamp, and then the retina and macula, and may request an OCT scan. Contrast and glare tests can help clarify a complaint that does not show on the letter chart (Superstein et al., 1999). The aim is not to prove that "the vision is fine," but to understand the cause of the complaint.
When not to wait
The complaints above develop slowly or fluctuate. A sudden drop in vision, increasing pain, or severe redness after surgery, or new flashes, floaters or a curtain over part of your vision, are not of this kind and need an examination the same day. See our article on flashes and floaters.
Questions patients often ask
Does 20/20 mean the operation succeeded?
It means the eye can read the chart under test conditions, which is an important success. But satisfaction with vision in daily life is a separate result, affected by dryness, residual focusing error, near vision and other factors (Mollazadegan and Lundström, 2015).
Do these symptoms improve with time?
Some do, such as surgery-related dryness in most cases (Hamed et al., 2022), and many cases of negative dysphotopsia (Osher, 2008). Others need treatment, such as residual astigmatism or capsule clouding.
Is the lens the cause, and do I need it replaced?
The lens may be a cause, but it is not the only one. Even with multifocal lenses, a study of dissatisfied patients found that the cause could be treated in 84.2% of eyes, with glasses, laser vision correction or laser for the capsule, while only 4% needed a lens exchange (de Vries et al., 2011).
Can quality of vision be measured?
Parts of it can be measured, such as contrast sensitivity and glare, alongside questions about daily activities (Superstein et al., 1999). But no single number sums it all up.
Summary
The 20/20 (6/6) number is an important measure but an incomplete one, because it measures only clear letters in good light. Vision may feel uncomfortable despite it because of dryness, a residual focusing error, a need for reading glasses, light phenomena, capsule clouding, or a change in the macula. No single cause explains every complaint. When patients explain exactly what bothers them, in what light and at what distance, the examination becomes more precise and the treatment clearer.
This information is for health education and does not replace a medical examination.
References
- Chu, C.J., Johnston, R.L., Buscombe, C., Sallam, A.B., Mohamed, Q. and Yang, Y.C. (2016) 'Risk Factors and Incidence of Macular Edema after Cataract Surgery: A Database Study of 81984 Eyes', Ophthalmology, 123(2), pp. 316–323. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.001. PubMed
- de Silva, S.R., Evans, J.R., Kirthi, V., Ziaei, M. and Leyland, M. (2016) 'Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction', Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(12), CD003169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub4. PubMed
- de Vries, N.E., Webers, C.A., Touwslager, W.R., Bauer, N.J., de Brabander, J., Berendschot, T.T. et al. (2011) 'Dissatisfaction after implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses', Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 37(5), pp. 859–865. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.11.032. PubMed
- Elliott, D.B., Hurst, M.A. and Weatherill, J. (1990) 'Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient's perceived visual disability', Eye, 4 ( Pt 5), pp. 712–717. doi: 10.1038/eye.1990.100. PubMed
- Hamed, M.A., Aldghaimy, A.H., Mohamed, N.S. and Amer, A.A. (2022) 'The Incidence of Post Phacoemulsification Surgery Induced Dry Eye Disease in Upper Egypt', Clin Ophthalmol, 16, pp. 705–713. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S358866. PubMed
- Hasegawa, Y., Honbo, M., Miyata, K. and Oshika, T. (2022) 'Type of residual astigmatism and uncorrected visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes', Sci Rep, 12(1), article 1225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05311-x. PubMed
- Masket, S. and Fram, N.R. (2021) 'Pseudophakic Dysphotopsia: Review of Incidence, Cause, and Treatment of Positive and Negative Dysphotopsia', Ophthalmology, 128(11), pp. e195–e205. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.009. PubMed
- Meacock, W.R., Spalton, D.J., Boyce, J. and Marshall, J. (2003) 'The effect of posterior capsule opacification on visual function', Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 44(11), pp. 4665–4669. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0634. PubMed
- Miura, M., Inomata, T., Nakamura, M., Sung, J., Nagino, K., Midorikawa-Inomata, A. et al. (2022) 'Prevalence and Characteristics of Dry Eye Disease After Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis', Ophthalmol Ther, 11(4), pp. 1309–1332. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00513-y. PubMed
- Mollazadegan, K. and Lundström, M. (2015) 'A study of the correlation between patient-reported outcomes and clinical outcomes after cataract surgery in ophthalmic clinics', Acta Ophthalmol, 93(3), pp. 293–298. doi: 10.1111/aos.12490. PubMed
- Osher, R.H. (2008) 'Negative dysphotopsia: long-term study and possible explanation for transient symptoms', Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 34(10), pp. 1699–1707. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.06.026. PubMed
- Schallhorn, S.C., Hettinger, K.A., Pelouskova, M., Teenan, D., Venter, J.A., Hannan, S.J. et al. (2021) 'Effect of residual astigmatism on uncorrected visual acuity and patient satisfaction in pseudophakic patients', Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 47(8), pp. 991–998. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000560. PubMed
- Schuster, A.K., Tesarz, J. and Vossmerbaeumer, U. (2013) 'The impact on vision of aspheric to spherical monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis', Ophthalmology, 120(11), pp. 2166–2175. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.011. PubMed
- Superstein, R., Boyaner, D. and Overbury, O. (1999) 'Functional complaints, visual acuity, spatial contrast sensitivity, and glare disability in preoperative and postoperative cataract patients', Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, 25(4), pp. 575–581. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)80059-5. PubMed
- Tavassoli, S., Ziaei, H., Yadegarfar, M.E., Gokul, A., Kernohan, A., Evans, J.R. et al. (2024) 'Trifocal versus extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses after cataract extraction', Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2024(7), CD014891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014891.pub2. PubMed